Former NYT Editor Claims They Did Nothing Wrong Despite Slandering Kavanaugh

September 20, 2019
546 Views

The New York Times might as well be considered a tabloid if they think that their recent coverage of a Kavanaugh allegation was ok. They slandered Justice Brett Kavanaugh when they left out a crucial detail to the story that completely undermines the whole accusation. But Former Executive Editor Jill Abramson feels they did nothing wrong.

Abramson was interviewed by FOX’s Harris Faulkner where she downplayed the incident.

“I think my move would have been the moves that the Times has made,” Abramson claimed defending the NYT. “I mean, no one has challenged the basic accuracy of the story that they published, or of what’s in the book. It’s true that a material fact was left out, and the Times ran an editor’s note explaining that. Which is what you do when you leave something out.”

“But it was no conspiracy to leave something out that fact, it was unfortunately cut from the piece.”

During the interview, it quickly became apparent that Abramson is biased and believes wholeheartedly that Kavanaugh is guilty of sexual misconduct. She claims that this is his “third example of sexual impropriety.” But she has no evidence of this aside from Ford’s allegation, that her lawyer claims was politically motivated, and unsubstantiated hearsay. She even claims the investigation into Kavanaugh was a sham.

Harris later redirected Abramson reminding her that her stance is not based on evidence. She then asks how the paper can sometimes print the truth and at other times fiction.

“There’s no evidence that it was fiction,” Abramson said. “And it was not.”

“Omission of the fact that the victim, the alleged victim, didn’t remember— ” Faulkner tried to once again remind her.

“Doesn’t make the story itself fiction,” Abramson cut her off. “It just doesn’t. It doesn’t make the story inaccurate,” Abramson said refusing to see reason.

Watch The Clip Below. 

So maybe this is why the paper struggles with the truth as she used to be an Executive Editor of the paper and likely taught her successor everything she knows.

You may be interested

Melania Trump Explains The Difference Between An Activist And Her Son
News For You
4117 views
News For You
4117 views

Melania Trump Explains The Difference Between An Activist And Her Son

Simon Daily - December 15, 2019

Dems don't seem to understand the difference between Barron Trump and Greta Thunberg. Thunberg is an activist making speeches to…

Jill Biden Claims Trump Is Afraid Of Joe
News For You
2260 views
News For You
2260 views

Jill Biden Claims Trump Is Afraid Of Joe

Simon Daily - December 15, 2019

Dem Presidential Candidate Joe Biden is out campaigning again and this time it appears he brought his wife along to…

Alan Dershowitz Claims The SCOTUS Practically Ruined The Dem’s Case For Impeachment
News For You
6771 views
News For You
6771 views

Alan Dershowitz Claims The SCOTUS Practically Ruined The Dem’s Case For Impeachment

Simon Daily - December 15, 2019

The Dems have pushed forth two articles of impeachment: abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. Alan Dershowitz claims that…