Former FEC Commissioner Claims There Is More Than Enough Evidence Needed to Investigate AOC
It looks like Alexandria Ocasio Cortez could soon be up for investigation. It turns out there is more than just her hidden campaign money.
“As a former FEC commissioner who has studied the complaint against Ocasio-Cortez and Chakrabarti, I have concluded that there is unquestionably more than enough evidence to justify the FEC opening a civil investigation,” Hans von Spakovsky, now a Heritage Foundation senior legal fellow, wrote in a Fox News op-ed Sunday.
“There seems to be enough evidence here to justify opening a criminal investigation,” he added.”
Ocasio-Cortez never disclosed to the FEC that she and Chakrabarti, who served as her campaign chair, controlled Justice Democrats while it was simultaneously supporting her primary campaign. If the FEC finds that her campaign and the political action committee were operating in affiliation, it could result in her campaign receiving excessive contributions, former FEC commissioner Brad Smith told TheDCNF.”
“The campaign committee of Ocasio-Cortez and her political action committee, Justice Democrats PAC, may have violated federal reporting requirements.
Federal law (52 U.S.C. §30104) and the pertinent FEC regulation (11 CFR §104.3(b)(4)) require any political committee – and both of these entities would qualify – to provide itemized descriptions of all their expenditures over $200.
Simply listing “strategic consulting” for almost $900,000 in disbursements to an organization that admits it was doing all of the administrative work of the campaign – including fundraising, campaign advertisements, organizing rallies and speaking events, and handling volunteers – certainly does not meet this requirement.
In fact, it looks like the campaign was using the PACs and the LLC to avoid disclosing the actual spending and work being done for Ocasio-Cortez’s campaign.
Moreover, if it is true that Ocasio-Cortez and/or her campaign manager controlled Justice Democrats PAC and Brand New Congress PAC, they would be considered “affiliated” organizations to her campaign organization.
Since the PACs were handing out money to the LLC to work on her campaign, the PACs and the campaign committee would be treated as the same organization by the FEC under federal law.
That means that the limit on a campaign contribution to a federal candidate ($2,700 in the 2018 election cycle) would apply to all three organizations.
In other words, if someone gave Ocasio-Cortez a $2,700 contribution and then gave another contribution to either of the other two PACS that Ocasio-Cortez and/or Chakrabarti were running, her campaign violated federal law by receiving and keeping a contribution above the legal limit. Each excessive contribution received is a separate violation of the law.
Finally, if Brand New Congress LLC was set up to create the “campaign infrastructure and fundraising” operations for the candidates, as Chakrabarti said, then his LLC may have been making undisclosed in-kind contributions to all of these campaigns – unless the campaigns were actually paying the fair market value of the services.”
So AOC could have been taking in way more than she should have when it comes to campaign donations. Since she was likely receiving them from three different sources. If that were not enough her hidden 900k is not legal either. Could this be the end for the clueless socialist?
You may be interested
Trump Gets Flak For Tweet About Rape And Incest Abortion ExceptionsSimon Daily - May 20, 2019
There has been a lot of movement when it comes to Pro-life advocacy. Georgia recently passed the Heartbeat bill and…
WOW, Even Rep Schiff Thinks Rep Amash Is Jumping The GunSimon Daily - May 20, 2019
Margaret Brennan interviewed Rep. Adam Schiff on CBS's Face The Nation. Brennan asked Schiff about the Rep Amash's claim that…
Mitt Romney Shuts Down Amash’s Call For ImpeachmentSimon Daily - May 20, 2019
Mitt Romney has always been critical of the president but during an interview on CNN's State of the Union with…