Gowdy: If Evidence Of Collusion With Russia Existed Adam Schiff Would Have Leaked It [Video]

It’s no secret that Adam Schiff (D-Calf) a notorious leaker. Especially after Trump lashed out at Rep. Schiff, calling him “one of the biggest liars” in Washington and accusing him of leaking confidential information.

“Little Adam Schiff, who is desperate to run for higher office, is one of the biggest liars and leakers in Washington, right up there with Comey, Warner, Brennan and Clapper! Adam leaves closed committee hearings to illegally leak confidential information. Must be stopped!” – Trump’s tweet read.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/960492998734868480

South Carolina Re. Trey Gowdy hit the nail on the head in his interview on Fox News. Stating that there is no evidence of collusion with Russia from the Trump campaign. His response is not only funny but so true.

“I have not seen one scintilla of evidence that this president colluded, conspired, confederated with Russia, and neither has anyone else, or you may rest assured Adam Schiff would have leaked it,” Gowdy said during an interview on “Fox News Sunday.”

“That’s why they’ve moved off of collusion onto obstruction of justice, which is now their current preoccupation,” he added.

According to The Daily Caller, in past interviews, Schiff, the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, has claimed that he has seen “more than circumstantial evidence” of collusion. But when pressed to identify the evidence, Schiff has stopped short of showing that President Donald Trump or members of his campaign conspired with Russian government officials to release Democrats’ hacked emails.

As Written By The Hill after the announcement of Russian indictments:

With minutes of its release  the latest indictment was unrecognizable after being put through the centrifuge of the Washington spin machine. The fact is that the indictment largely confirmed what we knew. It shows an effort by the Russians to undermine Clinton and influence the election; it also shows no evidence of knowing collusion and, indeed, very limited evidence of unknowing collusion.

 

Send this to a friend