Kavanaugh Accuser’s Ex Says She’s “Not Credible At All”, Filed For A Restraining Order

The Third woman to accuse Supreme Court Justice nominee, Brett Kavanaugh, of sexual misconduct has more than a few skeletons in her closet, apparently. Reports show that the third accuser, Julie Swetnick, had a restraining order filed against her years ago by her ex-boyfriend.

Swtnick’s says that Kavanaugh and his friend Judge attended several parties where date rape took place. Her claim does not make a lot of sense because the timeline is a little… off- to say the least.

As John McCormack points out, “Ms. Swetnick grew up in Montgomery County, Md., graduating from Gaithersburg High School in 1980 before attending college. She was attending high-school parties where gang rapes occurred while a college student?”

Swernick’s ex, Richard Vinneccy, says the two dated for years before breaking up where he then found his wife to be and went on to start a family with her. Vinneccy says that Swetnick threatened him and his new family at the time and is not to be trusted.

A Miami-Dade County court docket shows a petition for an injunction against Swetnick was filed March 1, 2001, by her former boyfriend, Richard Vinneccy, who said Wednesday the two had dated for four years before they broke up, According to The Daily Wire.

According to Vinneccy, Swetnick threatened him after they broke up and even after he got married to his current wife and had a child.

“Right after I broke up with her, she was threatening my family, threatening my wife and threatening to do harm to my baby at that time,” Vinneccy said in a telephone interview “I know a lot about her.”

That’s when Vinneccy says he was forced to file a restraining order that was later dismissed.

“She’s not credible at all,” he said. “Not at all.”

Swetnick does not accuse Kavanaugh himself of sexually assaulting her in the sworn statement, Politico reported. But she asserts Kavanaugh was present when she was the victim of a “gang rape” by multiple boys at one party.

Vinneccy made clear that he did not believe her story.

“I have a lot of facts, evidence, that what she’s saying is not true at all,” he said. “I would rather speak to my attorney first before saying more.”

Lawyer, Avenatti called the reporting “outrageous” and accused the press of “digging into the past” of a woman who stepped forward and is willing to testify under oath.

To that I ask; Why wouldn’t we want to dig in the past of someone making potentially damning accusations? Especially given the political climate and timing of the accusations.

“I am disgusted by the fact that the press is attacking a sexual assault victim,” Avenatti said.

When asked if the allegation of a restraining order were true, Avenatti said: “I don’t know one way or another,” adding he would research it further.

Julie Swetnick was first brought to the stage by Avenatti himself. Which, is questionable by itself. Why not contact the FBI? Why contact the porn star, Stormy Daniels’, lawyer? I don’t know the whole thing seems really strange.

What do you think? Let us know in the comments below.

Send this to a friend