ABC reporter Jon Karl questioned California Democrat Representative Ro Khanna concerning two Internal Revenue Service (IRS) whistleblowers who revealed Hunter Biden’s tax fraud. The witnesses allegedly declared that U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland misled the House Ways and Means Committee by claiming that attorney David Weiss had full authority to examine and prosecute the younger Biden.
“Are you troubled by what the whistleblowers claim to have heard?” Karl inquired.
Khanna responded, “Restating the facts, you had President Trump assign a U.S. attorney in Delaware and President Biden had the right to let that attorney go if he wanted. It’s normal for a new president to expel all the U.S. attorneys. But President Biden didn’t do that. Instead, he provided David Weiss, his adversary’s appointee, total power to make a decision about his son’s situation.”
Karl pointed out, “But the whistleblower claimed Weiss wasn’t the ultimate decision-maker in the case. If that’s true, doesn’t it demonstrate the AG deliberately lied to Congress?”
The Democrat couldn’t process the new information. Khanna argued, “Weiss isn’t saying that. He’s the key person, and he’s not making that statement.
Hunter Biden went into a plea agreement with Weiss on June 20 agreeing to pay for an illegal firearm possession and tax violations, with no jail time.
The informants further insisted Hunter Biden sent a WhatsApp message to Chinese energy agent Henry Zhao around July 30, 2017, putting his Dad, President Joe Biden in the middle of his corporate dealings. The message reported, “I am sitting here with [Joe Biden] and we would like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled.”
Based on this latest set of revelations, many are eager for the claims to be investigated to draw any proper conclusion. Obviously, Hunter’s troubles are not behind him. Should Hunter Biden get convicted, then President Biden will be confronted with the uncomfortable questions that accompany it.