The recent revelation that former President Joe Biden used identical autopen signatures on multiple executive orders has sparked significant legal and cognitive concerns, raising questions about the authenticity and constitutionality of his policy decisions. Critics argue that the use of an autopen—a device that replicates a handwritten signature—suggests a lack of direct involvement or awareness by Biden in the policies he ostensibly approved.
This has led to accusations that his staff may have exploited his cognitive decline to push through policies without his full understanding or consent. Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey has been particularly vocal, demanding that the Department of Justice investigate whether these executive orders were issued without Biden’s genuine approval, which could render them unconstitutional.
The Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project uncovered that many of Biden’s executive orders bore identical autopen signatures, indicating a reliance on automated signing rather than personal authorization. Bailey stated, “These executive orders should be considered unconstitutional because Biden did not know what he signed.”
This sentiment has been echoed by other conservative figures who argue that the liberal media has largely ignored or downplayed these concerns, focusing instead on protecting Biden’s legacy. The New York Post, however, conducted an analysis of presidential signatures from Donald Trump through Barack Obama to Joe Biden, revealing that while previous presidents maintained consistent, authentic signatures, Biden’s repeated use of the autopen stands out as a glaring anomaly.
The Department of Commerce’s December 2024 order, which used an autopen to declare office closures in honor of the late President Jimmy Carter, further highlights the issue. Critics argue that such practices undermine the integrity of the executive office and raise serious questions about the transparency of Biden’s administration. The liberal media’s reluctance to address these concerns has only fueled suspicions of a deliberate cover-up to shield Biden from scrutiny.
Watch
In contrast, President Donald Trump’s tenure was marked by a hands-on approach to governance, with his signature consistently appearing on executive orders and other official documents.
Trump’s commitment to direct involvement in policy decisions stands in stark contrast to the alleged detachment of the Biden administration. Supporters of Trump argue that this comparison underscores the importance of having a president who is fully engaged and mentally sharp, qualities they believe are essential for effective leadership.