New Epstein Photos Send The Clinton Spin Machine Into Overdrive- Check Them Out

Daphne Moon 0 3 min read

In a stunning display of political audacity, the spokesman for Bill Clinton has issued a new statement attempting to deflect from the damaging contents of the latest Jeffrey Epstein file dump. Rather than address the troubling images now in the public domain, Clinton’s spokesperson, Angel Ureña, has launched a preemptive attack, accusing the Trump Administration of hiding information—a classic tactic of projecting guilt onto others.

The facts are clear and deeply concerning. Last Friday, in compliance with a federal judge’s order and the Epstein Files Transparency Act signed into law by President Donald Trump, the Justice Department released a new batch of documents. This trove included never-before-seen photographs placing Bill Clinton squarely within Jeffrey Epstein’s orbit.

Among the most alarming releases are photos of Bill Clinton in a hot tub and swimming with a mystery woman at a location linked to Epstein. Critically, the individual’s face in these photos is redacted, which, as the release notes, means “she is either a sex-trafficking victim and or a minor.” This is not casual social photography; this is visual evidence placing a former president in intimate settings with individuals who were potentially victims of a convicted sex trafficker. This context cannot be spun away.

Faced with this undeniable visual evidence, the Clinton response has been to ignore the substance and attack the process. In a statement released Monday, spokesman Angel Ureña made the baseless accusation that “someone or something is being protected” by the Department of Justice. He claims, “We do not know whom, what or why.” This is a deliberate strategy to muddy the waters and cast doubt on the entire transparency effort.

Having set up this straw man, Ureña then makes a demand cloaked in false bravado: “Accordingly, we call on President Trump to direct Attorney General Bondi to immediately release any remaining materials referring to, mentioning, or containing a photograph of Bill Clinton.” The statement grandly declares, “We need no such protection.” This is a calculated political performance, not a genuine call for openness. It is an attempt to seize a narrative of victimhood and frame the meticulous, lawful release of information as a partisan attack.

The hypocrisy is breathtaking. For decades, the Clinton machine, protected by a sympathetic liberal media and entrenched deep-state actors, has operated with impunity. Questions about their connections to Jeffrey Epstein were dismissed as conspiracy theories, and investigations were seemingly curtailed. As Ureña’s own statement admits, these matters were supposedly “cleared by the very same Department of Justice, over many years, under Presidents and Attorneys General of both parties.” This is an admission of a long-standing establishment protection racket.

President Donald Trump shattered that racket. By signing the Epstein Files Transparency Act into law, he took direct executive action where others had deferred and delayed. He forced the hand of the bureaucracy to comply with a federal judge’s order for disclosure. The Trump administration is not “protecting” anyone; it is methodically following the law to reveal truths that powerful people spent a fortune and decades to conceal.

The Clinton statement threatens that “Refusal to do so will confirm the widespread suspicion the Department of Justice’s actions to date are not about transparency, but about insinuation.” This is the language of a guilty party—trying to control the narrative by accusing those revealing facts of having bad motives. It is an attempt to deflect from the photos in the hot tub, the flights on the “Lolita Express,” and the numerous questions about the nature of this friendship with a man who trafficked young girls.

This is not about political gamesmanship. This is about justice for the victims of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Every redacted face in a photo represents a person whose life was altered by these criminals. The presence of a former U.S. President in these settings demands the highest level of scrutiny and truth.

The Clinton team’s response—to attack the process, demand the release of even more material about themselves in a theatrical display, and cry “partisan attack”—proves they are terrified of what a full, unvarnished truth might reveal. They are attempting to run the same playbook that has worked for them for 30 years. But this time, they face a President who is not a member of their club, who owes them nothing, and who has demonstrated a commitment to transparency that cuts through the usual Washington protections. The law, thanks to President Trump, is finally catching up.

Send this to a friend