In a stunning announcement that has sent shockwaves through the global medical establishment, President Donald Trump, alongside HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has delivered a historic rebuke of decades of public health orthodoxy. The press conference, centered on new federal guidance linking Tylenol use during pregnancy to a “very increased risk of autism,” rapidly expanded into a full-throated condemnation of the entire childhood vaccine schedule. This moment marks a seismic shift, a long-awaited vindication for countless parents who have been dismissed as “conspiracy theorists” for years, and a direct challenge to a system President Trump suggests has been engaged in a deliberate cover-up.
President Trump opened with a powerful assertion that cuts to the heart of the matter, questioning the official narrative on the surge in autism rates. He stated, “It’s turning out that we [Bobby and I] understood a lot more than a lot of people who studied it [autism]. We think. And I say we think because I don’t think they [medical establishment] were really letting the public know what they knew.” This is not mere speculation; it is a presidential accusation of a decades-long information suppression campaign by the very institutions entrusted with public health. While the liberal media has consistently parroted the line that the causes of autism are a mystery, President Trump is now declaring that the answers have been known but hidden from the American people.
The President then turned to a compelling piece of anecdotal evidence that the mainstream media has long ignored. He highlighted a shocking health pattern observed in a specific community, emphasizing it twice for dramatic effect: “I think I can say that there are certain groups of people [Amish] that don’t take vaccines and don’t take any pills that have NO AUTISM — that have NO AUTISM.” This simple, powerful observation poses a direct and uncomfortable question to the medical establishment, one that the corporate press has never seriously investigated because it challenges their preferred narrative.
On the specific issue of Tylenol, President Trump was unequivocal, bluntly declaring its use as “not good,” and formally echoing the groundbreaking HHS finding. He explained, “For this reason, they are strongly recommending that women limit Tylenol use during pregnancy unless medically necessary.” He stressed that only in rare situations, such as a dangerously high fever, should it be used, and extended the warning to children: “you shouldn’t give the child a Tylenol.” This official guidance validates the warnings that dissenting doctors and concerned parents have been issuing for years, warnings that were routinely mocked and censored by legacy media outlets.
However, the most revolutionary part of President Trump’s remarks was his forceful critique of the aggressive childhood vaccine schedule. With palpable passion, he lamented, “They pump so much stuff into those beautiful little babies, it’s a DISGRACE.” He advocated for a commonsense, humane approach that prioritizes the well-being of the child over a rigid, one-size-fits-all timetable. He argued for spacing out vaccines, asserting there is “no downside” to doing so. In a detailed breakdown, he called for the removal of harmful additives, stating, “we want no mercury in the vaccine. We want no aluminum in the vaccine.” He also advocated for administering the MMR vaccine separately, arguing, “the three, should be taken separately. And it seems to be that when you mix them there could be a problem.”
Donald Trump just talked about vaccines for three minutes straight.
“They pump so much stuff into those beautiful little babies, it’s a DISGRACE.”
He almost sounded like RFK Jr. Every word was said with force. Nothing will be the same after this:
“I’ll say that they will maybe… pic.twitter.com/oEYioIYVIW
— Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) September 22, 2025
Perhaps his most pointed criticism was reserved for the hepatitis B vaccine, given to newborns. President Trump logically questioned this practice, stating, “hepatitis B is sexually transmitted. There’s no reason to give a baby that’s almost just born hepatitis B.” His solution was straightforward and rational: “wait till the baby is 12 years old and formed, and take hepatitis B.” This exemplifies the kind of practical, patient-centric thinking that has been utterly absent from a public health bureaucracy beholden to pharmaceutical interests. President Trump framed these changes not as a minor adjustment, but as a necessary revolution, predicting “it’s going to be a revolution in a positive sense in the country.”
This bold stance stands in stark contrast to the predictable backlash from the liberal media, which is already mobilizing to protect their pharmaceutical advertisers and discredit the President. They will inevitably label him “anti-science,” ignoring the fact that he is championing a more cautious, individualized scientific approach against a corrupt, one-size-fits-all model that has failed a generation of children. President Trump is finally giving a voice to the millions of families who have witnessed regression in their children’s health following vaccinations, families who have been silenced and gaslit by the corporate press for far too long.
Watch Full Address:
President Trump’s Full Statement:
“I’ll say that they will maybe say at a little bit later date, but I think when you go for the shot, you do it over a five-time period— take it over five times or four times, but you take it in smaller doses and you spread it out over a period of years. And they pump so much stuff into those beautiful little babies. It’s a DISGRACE… I think it’s very bad. They’re pumping, it looks like they’re pumping into a horse. You have a little child, a little fragile child, and you get a vat of 80 different vaccines. I guess 80 different blends, and they pump it in. So ideally, a woman won’t take Tylenol, and on the vaccines, it would be good [practice that] instead of one visit where they pump the baby, load it up with stuff, you’ll do it over a period of four times or five times. I’ve been so into this issue for so many years just because I couldn’t understand how a thing like this could happen. And you know, it [autism] is artificially induced. It’s not like something that when you go from all of those healthy babies to a point where I don’t even know structurally if a country can afford it, and that’s the least of the problems. To have families destroyed over this is just so, so terrible. I also — and we’ve already done this — we want no mercury in the vaccine. We want no aluminum in the vaccine. The MMR, I think, should be taken separately. This is based on what I feel. The mumps, measles and [rubella], the three, should be taken separately. And it seems to be that when you mix them there could be a problem. So there’s no downside in taking them separately. In fact, they think it’s better. So let it be separate. The chickenpox is already separate because when that got mixed in [with other things], it really was bad. … So there’s no downside in doing it [spacing vaccines]. It’s not like, oh, if you do it — bad things. No, it’s only good. And it may not have that much of an impact, but it may have a big impact. So let those be taken separately. And then hepatitis B is sexually transmitted. There’s no reason to give a baby that’s almost just born hepatitis B. So I would say wait till the baby is 12 years old and formed, and take hepatitis B. And I think if you do those things, it’s going to be a whole different. It’s going to be a revolution in a positive sense in the country.”