Former White House aid Cassidy Hutchinson was the star ‘witness’ for the J6 clown show who mainly testified to hallway gossip she claims to have heard. Something that, in a real court, would have never been allowed. The remainder of her testimony has been rebuked by the very people she claimed were ‘witnesses’— Such as the Secret Service agent that Hutchinson claimed drove Trump on January 6th.
Previously, we shared damning text messages where Hutchinson slammed the J6 committee but now, The Federalist drop an exclusive showing more leaked messages. I think the committee needed to do better research before calling just anyone to the stand:
“In a series of private communications from December 2020 through May 2021, shared exclusively with The Federalist, Hutchinson commiserated with other targets of the probe about how little information she had about any wrongdoing that day, and lamented how corrupt the politicized committee was. Far from being upset with Trump, Hutchinson repeatedly spoke in favor of him and his presidency.
“I would rather shoot myself dead into the Potomac than see marine one flying around this city without 45 again,” Hutchinson wrote in one message nearly three months after the Capitol riot.
In November 2021, Hutchinson was among the first former White House staffers to be subpoenaed by the Select Committee. In the weeks and months following, Hutchinson continued to disparage the politicized committee in private, and repeatedly joked about the same riot she now says leaves her with emotional scars today.”
It didn’t end there, but does that sound like a person ‘traumatized’ by Trump? Previously we shared a story about Hutchinson’s real feelings about the J6 committee where she showed total contempt for the clown show yet on the stand, she was a victim of a wild debunked story.
You can read more about evidence that The Federalist dropped: HERE.
The Federalist shared a Twitter response Hutchinson made after someone claimed that they believed Biden won the 2020 election fair and square:
“When we win again, we’re making her comms director Or press sec.” She also shared posts saying “stop the steal”.
The evidence against this former WH aide just goes on and on, doesn’t it? The J6 committee wields more research power in their little fingers than these new agencies so how is it they didn’t know she wasn’t a viable witness? I don’t think you can convince me they didn’t know.