Martha MacCallum Obliterates Treasonous Dem Lawmaker in Epic On-Air Takedown

Daphne Moon 0 3 min read

In a stunning display of journalistic integrity, a rarity in today’s liberal media landscape, Fox News’s Martha MacCallum performed an essential service for the American public by exposing the hollow and dangerous rhetoric of Democratic Congressman Jason Crow. The confrontation came after Rep. Crow and several of his colleagues posted a video that amounted to little more than a call for a soft coup, brazenly instructing members of the United States military to betray their Commander-in-Chief, President Donald Trump.

The Gateway Pundit rightly reported that this cabal of Democrats, including Senators Elissa Slotkin and Mark Kelly, along with Representatives Chris DeLuzio, Chrissy Houlahan, Maggie Goodlander, and Jason Crow, essentially ordered these dedicated professionals to commit treason. Their prescription was nothing short of insurrection, wrapped in the deceptive language of defending the Constitution, as they urged service members to refuse so-called ‘illegal’ orders from President Trump.

When Rep. Crow appeared on Fox News to defend this disgusting video, he was swiftly and thoroughly embarrassed by MacCallum’s logical and persistent questioning. She immediately identified the core problem with the Democrats’ vague and alarmist message, pointing out that it was completely detached from any tangible reality or actual policy being executed by the Trump Administration.

MACCALLUM: “You’re not talking about actual policy, you’re not talking about things that our service members are actually being asked to do, so when you see this video all over the place on social media, a lot of people see this and say, ‘What exactly are they talking about?’ Are they talking about not allowing gunboats to make it to the United States carrying drugs?”

This line of questioning left the congressman floundering. Instead of providing a coherent answer, Crow deflected with a nonsensical retort that failed to address the substance of the inquiry, demonstrating that his entire argument was built on a foundation of hypotheticals and fearmongering.

CROW: “Martha, here’s a novel idea. How about we actually prevent things from happening before they become a problem?”

MacCallum correctly shot back, “That is what they’re trying to do,” highlighting how the proactive national security measures of the Trump Administration are precisely aimed at preventing crises before they erupt on American soil. The congressman’s attempt to pivot only served to reveal that he had no specific grievance, only a generalized hatred for President Trump.

The interview continued to unravel for the loathsome Dem congressman as MacCallum pressed him for specifics, a request that the liberal media almost never makes of its preferred politicians. She demanded to know what specific, unlawful order he was actually referencing, and Crow could not name a single one.

MACCALLUM: “What specific order from the commander-in-chief that we are asking our military to carry out are you objecting to? This is very, very vague. No one could figure out what you were talking about, honestly.”

Crow’s response was to fall back on the tired and baseless talking point about “disturbing comments,” proving that his entire position was built on illusions and not on any concrete action taken by President Trump. He was peddling fear, not facts.

The humiliation deepened when MacCallum raised the issue of Iran, where President Trump has taken decisive action to protect American interests and global security by targeting nuclear facilities. Crow could only muster a weak complaint about process, arguing that the administration should come to Congress, a feeble attempt to obstruct the President’s constitutional authority to direct military operations.

MACCALLUM: “So we aided a mission by Israel in Iran, did you have a problem taking out Iranian nuclear facilities?”

CROW: “We have seen more conflict and more use of the military in the first 11 months of this administration than in any administration.”

This was a blatant mischaracterization of a strategy focused on deterrence and decisive action to avoid larger conflicts, a strategy that has kept America safe. MacCallum masterfully highlighted the confusion and potential danger that Crow’s vague instructions could cause for the brave men and women in uniform.

MACCALLUM: “I’m trying to figure out specifically what your issue is. So, for prominent members of the United States Congress, to tell young men and women of the military that they should not abide by ‘illegal orders’ and to leave it so vague…It could be very confusing for those who have committed to service.”

In the end, Congressman Crow was left with nothing. He could not outline a single unlawful order because none exist. He was exposed as just another partisan Democrat more interested in undermining a duly elected president than in supporting the troops or ensuring the nation’s security. This interview was a powerful reminder of why the American people placed their trust in President Donald Trump’s strong leadership.

Send this to a friend