MSNBC Defends Biden’s Garbage Nominee, Sparks Debate Over Anti-Muslim Bias

According to a recent segment on MSNBC’s The Weekend show, two Democratic senators are facing backlash for their decision not to support President Biden’s nominee for a seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals 3rd Circuit. Co-anchors Symone Sanders-Townsend and Alicia Menendez, along with guest Michael Steele and MSNBC.com writer Hayes Brown, passionately came to the defense of Biden’s nominee, Adeel Mangi, who is facing rejection due to allegations against him.

The segment started with a clip of Democratic Senator Cory Booker passionately defending Mangi and praising his work, regardless of what happens with his nomination. Co-anchor Sanders-Townsend then expressed her belief that “politics was fueling a lot of the vitriol and misinformation” surrounding the nominee. Brown chimed in, claiming that “racism against a Muslim candidate” is at the root of the controversy against Mangi.

However, Brown and Sanders-Townsend failed to provide any evidence to support their claims. On the other hand, Republican Senator John Kennedy has compiled a detailed record of Mangi’s questionable associations and actions. For example, Mangi served on the advisory board of the Alliance of Families for Justice, which supports the release of convicted cop-killers. He also served on the advisory board of the Center for Security, Race and Rights, which has a director who has openly expressed anti-Semitic and anti-Israel views.

Despite these troubling associations, when asked directly if he believes Israeli Jews are “colonial settlers,” Mangi dodged the question, claiming he is not knowledgeable enough about the region to have an opinion. This weak response speaks for itself.

The anchors and guest went on to claim that Democratic senators are afraid to support Mangi due to potential backlash. However, this argument falls flat when considering that one of the senators who opposed Mangi, Joe Manchin, has already announced he will not be running for re-election. Additionally, the suggestion that politics plays a role in judicial confirmations is nothing new, as evidenced by the Democrats’ shameful attacks on Brett Kavanaugh and Senator Biden’s own behavior during Clarence Thomas’s confirmation in 1991.

As an MSNBC writer, Brown’s job is to help frame the news for readers. However, based on this segment, it seems that his agenda is to push false narratives and ignore facts in order to push a certain political agenda.

The rejection of Mangi’s nomination is not the product of politics or racism. It is the result of legitimate concerns raised by senators, including those from his own party, about his associations and actions. In a time when judicial confirmations are fiercely debated and scrutinized, it is important for all candidates to be thoroughly vetted and for senators to make informed decisions rather than blindly support a nominee based on their political party or religion.

WATCH

I

Is the responsibility of the media to provide unbiased reporting and present all sides of a story, rather than cherry-picking information to fit a certain narrative. The failure to do so only perpetuates division and misinformation, which is not in the best interest of the public or our democracy. Let us hope that in the future, MSNBC and other media outlets will focus on the facts rather than personal biases when covering important issues such as this one.

Send this to a friend