Comedian Shane Gillis’s monologue on “Saturday Night Live” has reignited the age-old debate in the comedy world – how far is too far? His controversial and edgy style of humor has often pushed the boundaries of decency and propriety, and this was no exception as he opened his monologue with jokes about his firing from the show, his strained relationship with his mother, and more. However, the real question now is, will “SNL” invite him back after all he said?
In the world of comedy, where the line between genius and garbage, and hilarious and heinous is thin, no comedian is too outrageous. It is a common belief that in the pursuit of humor, all things must be fair game, and no topic or person is off-limits. This is the very maxim that Shane Gillis embodies, with his unapologetic and often offensive style of comedy.
However, with the rise of cancel culture and political correctness, comedians now find themselves walking on eggshells trying to navigate through a minefield of potential offenses. In 2019, Gillis faced the consequences of his past comments and was fired from “SNL” just five days after being hired by Lorne Michaels. But the comedy circuit, much like a circus, is always bustling with new acts – and Gillis was back in the spotlight once again, this time on “SNL”.
His opening monologue was a masterclass in reverse psychology as he pleaded with the audience not to Google his past, subtly acknowledging the inevitable backlash the media would unleash on him. This tactic not only helped him preempt the criticism but also highlighted the absurdity of cancel culture and the state of comedy today. As NPR TV critic Eric Deggans wrote, “Much of it felt like Gillis’ attempt to insulate himself from criticism and avoid any jokes that could revive the backlash.”
In inviting Gillis back, “SNL” has opened the floodgates of ethical and philosophical questions. Is the platform endorsing his views, or is it merely providing a stage for a diversity of opinions, however controversial they may be? And more importantly, does the inclusion of such perspectives enrich the comedic discourse, or does it serve to alienate and offend?
This move by “SNL” poses a challenge to its own stance on inclusivity and sensitivity. By elevating Gillis, a comedian who was previously deemed too offensive, are they contradicting their own values? Does the pursuit of diversity and representation in comedy also mean giving a platform to those whose humor crosses lines of decency and respect?
Comedian Jerry Seinfeld had previously steered clear of college campus shows in 2015 because students had become infected with the virus of political correctness. This is a telling sign of the impact of cancel culture on the world of comedy. Gillis’s monologue served as a commentary on this very issue – the chilling effect it has on comedic expression.
However, his appearance on “SNL” has also sparked a much-needed conversation on the boundaries of comedy and the role of comedians in challenging societal norms. It is a reminder that comedy, at its core, is a reflection of society and holds up a mirror to our virtues and vices, our absurdities and our truths.
Shane Gillis’s monologue! pic.twitter.com/pd1DjEhtp7
— Saturday Night Live – SNL (@nbcsnl) February 25, 2024
So, will “SNL” invite Gillis back? It’s unlikely, given the obvious defiance in his monologue. But the real value of his appearance lies in the conversation it has sparked.
Bring back comedy…