CNN legal analyst Elie Honig strongly criticized the recent developments in the trial against former President Donald Trump, saying that the testimony of porn star Stormy Daniels was “disastrous” for the prosecution’s case. Honig argued that the cross-examination by Trump’s attorneys went poorly for Democratic Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.
Honig highlighted Daniels’ responses to questions from Trump’s attorneys, stating that they were “disastrous” for the prosecution. He pointed out that when the witness openly expresses hatred towards the person whose liberty is at stake, it significantly undermines their credibility. In this case, Daniels has made public statements and tweets expressing her dislike for Trump and even fantasizing about him being in jail. This, according to Honig, is a significant red flag and raises doubts about her reliability as a witness.
Moreover, Honig also noted other pertinent issues that emerged from the cross-examination of Daniels, including her outstanding debt of $500,000 to Trump and her defiance of a court order to pay it. He argued that this could also be used by the defense team to discredit her testimony and question her integrity. If Daniels is willing to defy a court order, why should she be trusted to uphold the oath she took in court?
On further examination, it seems that the cross-examination by Trump’s attorneys is making significant inroads in the case. While Daniels’ direct testimony may have initially seemed beneficial for the prosecution, the defense has effectively challenged her credibility and raised doubts about her reliability as a witness. Honig admitted that at the end of the direct examination, it seemed like the prosecution had gotten what they needed. However, the cross-examination has seemingly turned the tide in Trump’s favor.
The trial, led by Democratic Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, has indicted Trump on 34 felony counts related to the alleged falsification of business records regarding a $130,000 payout to porn star Stormy Daniels in 2016. However, with the current developments in the courtroom, it seems that the prosecution’s case is crumbling. Honig himself admitted that the cross-examination was a “big damn deal” for the prosecution, as Daniels’ responses have severely damaged her credibility as a witness.
It seems that the recent developments in the trial against Trump are favoring the defense. The cross-examination of Stormy Daniels by Trump’s attorneys has raised significant doubts about her credibility, making it challenging for the prosecution to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Not that she ever had any credibility to begin with but watching her crash and burn? PRICELESS!