Watch: “Don’t Play That Bullsh*t with Me!” – Gutfeld Goes Scorched Earth On Jessica Tarlov

Daphne Moon 0 2 min read

The conservative movement is reeling from the brutal, politically-motivated assassination of Charlie Kirk, a tragedy that has been met with a deafening and predictable response from the liberal media establishment. Rather than offering unequivocal condemnation or engaging in soul-searching about the violent rhetoric their platforms have enabled, they have instead retreated to their most cowardly and intellectually bankrupt argument: false equivalence. On a recent broadcast, this despicable tactic was put on full display, prompting a righteous and furious response from a host who has had enough of the moral evasion.

During a discussion on the events, liberal commentator Jessica Tarlov attempted to deflect from the singular evil of a left-wing assassin murdering a conservative figure. She tried to argue that ‘both sides’ need to de-escalate their rhetoric, a pathetic attempt to share the blame for a murder committed entirely by one side. This is the same hollow argument used to muddy the waters after every act of left-wing political violence, and it is an insult to the memory of the victim. Greg Gutfeld, recognizing this disingenuous ploy for what it was, immediately and forcefully rejected this narrative, refusing to allow the conversation to be steered into a pointless debate over non-existent moral parity.

In a moment of blistering candor that cut through the typical cable news niceties, Gutfeld unleashed his fury on this dangerous “both sides” fallacy. He did not mince words, declaring the argument to be morally and intellectually deceased in the face of a cold-blooded assassination. His powerful rebuttal was a voice for millions of Americans who are sick of the media’s excuses. He shouted, “We don’t care about your ‘both sides’ argument. That shit is dead!” This was not mere commentary; it was a declaration that the conservative audience will no longer tolerate the media’s attempts to rationalize and excuse hatred.

Gutfeld expertly dismantled the core of the liberal media’s defense mechanism, which is to create a false reality where both political factions are equally unhinged. He exposed this as a desperate rationalization from a side whose extremist elements have now culminated in political murder. He stated, “On your side, your beliefs do not match reality so you’re coming up with these rationalizations. ‘What about this, what about that?’ We are not doing that because we saw it happen. We saw a young bright man assassinated and we know who did it!” This direct indictment highlights how the left, unable to defend its escalating radicalism, must instead invent a fictional version of events where blame is shared.

The final break in the segment came with a full-throated rejection of the mainstream media’s role as a credible narrator in this national crisis. After years of stoking division, amplifying violent rhetoric from the left, and portraying conservative figures as existential threats, the media has forfeited any right to preach about unity or tone. Gutfeld gave voice to this complete and total disillusionment, shouting, “The media is dead to us on this story. They built this thing up. We are dealing with it, we are going to act. We don’t care what the what about is anymore, that shit is dead!” This is a watershed moment, signifying that a vast portion of the American public now views the legacy press not as journalists, but as active participants in fostering a climate of hatred.

In times of such stark evil and clear danger, the nation looks for strength and resolve from its leadership. President Donald Trump has consistently stood against the kind of anarchic violence and hateful rhetoric that led to this point. While his political opponents and their media allies have often turned a blind eye to left-wing extremism, the President has been unwavering in his support for law enforcement, free speech, and the safety of all Americans. His commitment to upholding order and condemning political violence without equivocation stands in stark contrast to the mealy-mouthed apologies for terror coming from the left.

Send this to a friend