“She couldn’t answer a question about what doesn’t work about capitalism. She couldn’t get it out,” Kelly said. “She not only wasn’t ready to say what the Biden administration is going to try different than ordinary capitalism to build things back, but she didn’t know what doesn’t work about it. I mean that’s something that you can teach someone, right? Um, it doesn’t work because of this … and this and this policy has some limitations. I mean they couldn’t even get her that far.”
I’m not enough of a fan of Megyn Kelly to know just how objective she is, but Kamala Harris has a reputation that I know well.
My family is of Indian descent, and there are a lot of mixed-race families in my family. My cousins are either light-skinned, black, white or asian. This reputation is not just from hearsay.
In terms of my opinion of Megyn Kelly, I have and do listen to other reviews to come to my own conclusion. But I think there is an inconsisient and often skewed inconsistency out there with her comments and analysis, that can not be consistent across the board.
Regardless, Megyn Kelly’s criticism of Harris’ lack of substance and her team’s focus on appearance over policy is valid. Harris has struggled to provide coherent and substantive answers on important issues, and her constant flip-flopping on policy positions raises questions about her true values and beliefs.
It is important for politicians to be held accountable for their actions and words, and for journalists to call out those who prioritize style over substance.
This is especially true for someone in the position of Vice President, who is expected to be a competent and knowledgeable leader.
It remains to be seen if Harris will improve in her performance and policy positions, but it is clear that her team needs to focus on more than just her appearance if she wants to be taken seriously by the American people.